Sister Lucy : Part I

Facial Recognition Experts prove Novus Ordo Vatican’s “Sister Lucy of Fatima” was an Impostor


Ladies and gentlemen, this is big news: A team of professional facial recognition experts has concluded a scientific investigation into the question of whether Sister Lucia dos Santos of Fatima, one of the three children to whom Our Lady appeared in 1917, is in fact the same woman whom the Vatican paraded around as an adherent of Vatican II and the conciliar “popes” from 1958 until her own death in 2005.

The results are now in and can be summarized in two words: HECK NO!

The following announcement was just released on Dr. Peter Chojnowski’s blog, who initiated this project:

I can now release the overall results of the facial recognition tests that have been performed using the most up to date technology available analyzed by the most sophisticated software technicians and organized and analyzed by an expert investigator.

“The only thing similar was the habit” were the words I just heard from the investigator in our phone conversation about the result. More specifics on the technicalities of the result will follow this initial announcement.

On advice, I will not yet reveal the name of the investigators, the names of the companies involved, or the names of the programs being used. They are the best. They are all working on a comprehensive and definite report on the results and this will be released in the coming weeks. I want to avoid any interference in the investigation. After the final facial recognition report is complete, the second phase of the investigation will be launched which will be finding out the identity of the Imposter and finding out what happened to our dear Sister Lucy dos Santos.

More soon.

(Peter Chojnowski, “Fraud: Facial Recognition Technology With 2,400 Picture Comparisons Shows Sister Lucy I (Pre-1958) and Sister Lucy II (Post-1958) are Definitely NOT the Same Person”, RadTrad Thomist, Aug. 1, 2018)
Last edited by a moderator:


You just beat me to it! It is remarkable the money and effort that Dr. Peter Chojnowski has put in to getting experts
to examine the matter.


Sister Lucy I: Missing
Sister Lucy II: Impostor

Fraud: Facial Recognition Technology With 2,400 Picture Comparisons Shows Sister Lucy I (Pre-1958) and Sister Lucy II (Post-1958) are Definitely NOT the Same Person.

Last edited:


August 18, 2018

Best Video footage of the first time the Imposter Sister Lucy was put before the Public on May 13, 1967 and, also, Close-Up Footage of the Imposter Aged 70 or 80.

One interesting thing about this picture is that when the Plastic Surgeon was presented with all the file of pictures of Sister Lucy, he, without any prompting from us said, "This picture has been photoshopped." His analysis of this will be included in the report that will be issued.

Now for the videos:

Paul VI Meeting with "Sister Lucy" in Fatima on May 13, 1967. Here the deception is unrecognized by hundreds of thousands.

Here is the best close up video of the laughing, light-hearted, joking "Sister Lucy" who replaced the Real Sister Lucy, one of the "prophets of doom."

Last edited:


Original Photo of "the Meeting" between Paul VI and "Sister Lucy" found! TV Camera Stands Next to Paul VI. "Sister Lucy" Cut and Pasted In.

August 27, 2018

The Amazing Appearance of "Sister Lucy"

Dr. Chojnowski: Due to the diligent work of a co-worker in the Sister Lucy Truth project, we have come up with the original picture --- which a professional plastic surgeon immediately recognized was "photoshopped" --- of the first appearance of Sister Lucy II. As you can see by examining the two pictures, the TV camera still appears in the background of the superimposed "Sister Lucy". Sister Lucy II's face is slightly turned from the source photo, so as to make the eyes point in the proper direction. One of the strange things that can be noticed about Paul VI's arm is that in the faked picture, the fingers of his right hand are much farther away from his left sleeve than they are in the original photo. When you look at Sister Lucy II in this photo for a while the faked nature of the photo becomes perfectly clear.

Below are the source photos from which the picture of Sister Lucy II was clearly taken. To prove that this is not simply some internet photoshopping, we present the official publication (Blue Army) in which one instance of the photo appears.

Also, Supporters of Sister Lucy Truth: I have been away for the last couple of weeks at a location in which the internet is very sketchy. As I have mentioned at the beginning of this month, we are now busy putting together the professional reports from private investigators, facial recognition experts, plastic surgeons, a prosthodontist, and a ophthalmologist.

When I started this effort I did not realize how much time it would take to produce these reports and collect them into a single file. I am dependent on their schedules --- which are tight. The working is being done. I will publish the results about this case as soon as I am able --- I realize it is late August. Please be generous in your support of Sister Lucy Truth. The bills are coming in. Nothing in this work, except the work of myself and some generous associates, is for free, unfortunately. In a way that is a good thing, since we know that we are getting professional analysis.

I will publish the source pictures tomorrow, so that I can get this posting up without problems today.







Also, I did a research to find out who first published these compositions. The Hemeroteca Municipal de Lisboa (a library not for books but for journals) has a special page with roughly 20 publications of the 1967 visit of Paul VI in Fátima:

The journal Stella ("revista católica de cultura feminina") is a publication of the Congregação das Irmãs Reparadoras de Nossa Senhora de Fátima. The issues of May 1967 and June 1967 can be found here.

The titlepage of May 1967 shows the following photomontage:


This issue contains a total of three such photomontages (see link above) including the one Chonowski shows.

Then there is the monthly periodical Fátima 50 ("revista mensal de actualidades documental e ilustrada") published by the "Santuário de Nossa Senhora de Fátima", which a few weeks after the event republished two of the same photomontages.


Last edited:


Faked Photo of Paul VI and Sister Lucy Published In Official Sources.
Why Fake a Photo of an Event that "Actually Happened"?

August 31, 2018

Original and then Faked Photograph of a meeting of Paul VI with "Sister Lucy."

Source Picture of Faked Photo and Photo Manipulated So that it fits with the Scene with Paul VI.
I have spent a couple of hours trying to post the pictures of the books in which this picture appears and the pages upon which these pictures appear in official publications of the Blue Army and the Convent of Coimbra. I am so far unsuccessful. However, this faked photo appears in:
Documents on Fatima & the Memoirs of Sister Lucy by Fr. Antonio Maria Martins, published by Fr. Robert Fox in Pictorial Documentary and Historical Updates on page 79 and in A Pathway Under the Gaze of Mary published by the Carmel of Coimbra and identified as the Biography of Sister Lucy.

Here is the Link to the Faked Photo on the official Fatima Shrine Website:

On the page which contains this picture in Documents on Fatima, the text states: "The Pope presents her to the crowd of hundreds of thousands and before many journalists and the television cameras of the world. To the left of the Pope is Bishop John Venancio, then administrator of the diocese. Bishop John Venancio later stated, "This gesture of the Pope indicated, 'What Sister Lucy stands for, I stand behind.'"

Sister Lucy Truth Supporters: As I have mentioned in an earlier blog post, the investigation has expanded to a diverse group of medical professionals along with involving the professional investigator and the latest facial recognition technology analyzed by the most proficient experts. Recently the material has been submitted to a group of orthodontists for their analysis.

I have been away in Rome for 10 days. Now that Autumn begins, RadTrad Thomist is back in daily business, both on the Ecclesial Crisis front and the Sister Lucy Truth front. Please keep up your generous support and your heartening and moving letters. I will get out the information as soon as it is prepared to the satisfaction of the professionals who must put their names to their judgments in this case. We are making daily phone calls and continually gathering information. To those from the Fatima Movement that have viewed our efforts with contempt or disinterest. I believe you will wish you had not. Please not also that not ONE CENT of monies donated to Sister Lucy Truth has gone into my trip to Rome or to any of my own efforts invested in this investigation. Every dime has gone into hiring experts and for mailing out of receipts for tax-deduction purposes.




Kevin Symonds Admits that Previously Posted Photo of Paul VI and "Sister Lucy" was Doctored. BUT......He also "knows" that there was not any "conspiracy" involved and it is no big deal. MOVE ON.....NOTHING TO SEE HERE.

September 01, 2018

Since Kevin Symonds refuses to allow me to take any piece of his posts to post on this website --- I will just give you the link to his blog. Clearly faked photos of Paul VI and "Sister Lucy" are no big deal and most certainly not part of any suspicious "conspiracy." The fact that these appeared in official publications and are part of the accepted Sister Lucy biography, is apparently meaningless and of absolutely no concern. That, Mr. Symonds, OR THEY ARE FURTHER EVIDENCE --- just little bits of evidence, of course, --- THAT THE VATICAN HAS PERPETRATED ONE OF THE BIGGEST FRAUDS IN THE HISTORY OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. But of course, since Mr. Symonds is so attached to the men in today's Vatican, he will not lend any support or encouragement to an investigation to prove --- in a scientific way --- that Sister Lucy I and Sister Lucy II were the same person or different people. Clearly Fatima was being USED by the powers that be in 1967 to advance their revolutionary agenda --- now --- endorsed by Our Lady's Messenger.
Here is the link to Mr. Symonds' "Nothing to See Here" article: doctored-photo-lucia

P.S. For the commentators on this blog who have rubbished this entire effort as a huge "money making operation," I can only say that I will PROVE that this calumny is wrong. Why would I risk my immortal soul, destroy my reputation for life, and render a farce one of the major efforts of my life to make an extra $25,000? Every CENT has been spent on the investigation and will continue to be spent on the CONTINUING investigation. Impatience often seems to turn into down right meanness.

I would like to also ask my readers why the manipulators of Fatima would doctor these photos even though Sister Lucy II was clearly there. This can be seen on the videos that I have published of this event. Ideas?



Here is the Link to the Sister Lucy' Museum's Use of this Faked Photo in their NewFatima Propaganda effort. Again folks, NOTHING TO SEE HERE..........

Check out the video at the 1:12 mark especially.​

On the faked photo, notice how the right sleeve of Paul VI was extended in order to make it appear that he was extremely close to Sister Lucy II. So instead of listening to the warning words of "Sister Lucy" ---- and does it look for a second like she is giving warning words (in 1967) --- Paul VI is actually listening to the adulating crowds who will take that enthusiasm into the new Modernist Revolution which he was planning. Suddenly, with this photo, Sister Lucy is no longer a "prophet of doom" but an enthusiastic participant in Montini's Revolution. Without Photoshop!!!! Just a little Cut and Paste.

Read : Popular Posts



Breaking News: Sister Lucy II Did NOT Have Dentures. BUT She DID Seem to Bi-ilocate. See Identical Sister Lucy Picture with DIFFERENT backgrounds! Handwriting Analysis and Height Analysis To be Included in Report.

Posted: 05 Sep 2018 06:35 AM PDT

As Investigation expands its study to include handwriting analysis, height analysis, eye-lids analysis, and eye analysis, we have an instance of Sister Lucy II bi-locating. Here she is with an identical face and position and look and yet with totally different backgrounds. Cut and Paste, friends. Due to the intervention of Kevin Symonds we have come across a magazine called Fatima 50 from the years 1967 to 1970. MANY GREAT PHOTOS FROM THE 1967 "MEETING" PUBLISHED IN IT. SEE LINK BELOW. THANKS KEVIN!

And yes, Sister Lucy II did NOT have dentures. All will be in the report.



Again Sister Lucy II has to Bi-Locate to Get Near Paul VI during his 1967 Visit to Fatima. As Top Physicians, Plastic Surgeons, Dental Specialists, Private Investigators Analyze and Report about the Photos of "Sister Lucy," More Faked Photos Emerge . As Falling Flowers Used as Confetti Are in Identical Places, "Sister Lucy" Appears and Disappears from 1967 Photos.

Posted: 08 Sep 2018 01:18 PM PDT

Faked Photo. How many times did they cut and paste the same image of Sister Lucy into pictures of 1967 visit to Fatima of Paul VI?

Suddenly, same confetti, same position of all,
and, yet, NO Sister Lucy!

Book in which faked photos were published. There is the fake Sister Lucy again!

Dr. Chojnowski: As I write, the Sister Lucy case is being considered by expert physicians of the international community. As we at Sister Lucy Truth work to put together all of their findings in a single dossier for presentation to the public, we continually run into more and more of these faked photos from 1967, the first time that Sister Lucy II was presented to the public. Clearly the "Sister Lucy" imposter was present, but very few, if any, close ups of her face ---- in which it is not half veiled --- were taken. There were, obviously, a number of professionals who were let in on the bizarre substitution and they tried to create events and moments in which "Sister Lucy" was only the smiling acolyte of Paul VI, then involved in preparing a new mass, new sacraments, new religious movements, and new doctrine. Here is "Sister Lucy" ensuring that the Message of Fatima does not, in any way, conflict with this new Montinian Church.
I think the Fatima Center, who has taken down all the videos of my many lectures at their conferences, had better pay attention.

We are working to produce a complete dossier on the Sister Lucy case, incorporating all the studies, from all of the experts consulted, in the month of September.


There WAS an Imposter. On the Day of the Miracle of the Sun, We Publish Our First of Many Expert Reports. A Plastic Surgeon's Judgment on the Case of the Two Sister Lucys.

October 12, 2018

"On the 101st anniversary of Our Lady of Fatima, we are presenting one expert report on the issue of an imposter Sister Lucia. Hopefully, the release of this report demonstrates that we are approaching this issue very seriously and have engaged some of the top doctors, scientists, and companies in the world. There will be much more to come, and we need your support now more than ever. The investigation is intensifying.

As seen in this report (and others) the analysis of the photographic images refers to Subject A (0-18 years old), Subject B (20-40 years), Subject C (60 years old), and Subject D (75 years+). Attached is an example of a photograph from each Subject. These are the four groups we divided the images into to organize the analysis. We are currently of the opinion that Subject A and Subject B are the same individual. We are also relatively confident (though not certain) that Subject C and Subject D are the same individual. As Dr. Garcia notes, we are confident Subject A/B depict a different individual than the individual(s) depicted in Subject C/D. Much more analysis to come!
A few highlights of Dr. Garcia's analysis:
  • Dr. Garcia possesses a degree in art history and is of Hispanic descent giving him a unique background to assess this question.
  • Dr. Garcia is the individual who first identified the presence of a fake image that has been previously discussed on this site.
  • Dr. Garcia thinks that multiple items suggest a different individual but the strongest evidence is the chin and eyelids. He also thinks the noses are different.
Here is Dr. Garcia's Report:

Here are some of the sample pictures which were analyzed by Dr. Garcia. One picture is presented as an example of Sister Lucy A (Child), B (40s and 50s), C (1967), and D (post-1982).



Well-Known Member
This is probably due to the fact that Paul VI was a know homosexual and Sr. Lucy would not be seen with him.



Help Sister Lucy Truth Crack the Secret of the Third Secret: General Call for Writing Samples from "Sister Lucy".

Posted: 03 Nov 2018 08:33 PM PDT

Nah.......Just Doesn't Seem Right
Sister Lucy Truth is putting out a general call for any writing samples that may be in the digital or printed possession of our readers. These should be originals or high-quality copies. We are submitting these samples to the best analysts in the world and will need as many from the pre-1967 Sister Lucy and any from the post-1967 "Lucy". We would also like any video, photographic, or newspaper evidence from the meeting of "Sister Lucy" with Paul VI on May 13th, 1967.

Not only can an investigation into handwriting samples help us to crack the case of the identity of Sister Lucy I and Sister Lucy II, but it will also allow us to make a scientific judgment on the "Third Secret" supposedly revealed by the Vatican --- and endorsed by "Sister Lucy" --- in 2000. Was this the real Third Secret, was it some other vision had by Sister Lucy or one of the other two children, or was it a complete fabrication? If Sister Lucy was done away with around 1968, surely one of the main reasons for it would have been the Third Secret. Please submit all samples you may have care of me at

Here are some handwriting samples below:

From a Letter Written by Sister Lucy in 1940




What Sister Lucy SHOULD have looked like at the Age of 60 and What she "Did" look like. One of the Best Forensic Artists in the World Presents their Rendition. Again, No Problem Here!

November 10, 2018

World-Class Forensic Artist's Portrayal of Sister Lucy at 60

Sister Lucy II at 60 when she met the "sainted" Paul VI

We have asked for the help of a world-class forensic artist to give us an age-progression analysis of the face of Sister Lucy I, based upon the dozens of pictures we have of her pre-1950. The first sketch above is her rendition of what Sister Lucy, based upon all of the early pre-1950 pictures, would look like in 1967 when she would have been 60 years old. That is the first picture.

The second picture is the picture of the woman, let us call her, Sister Lucy II, as she looked in 1967 when she met Paul VI at Fatima on May 13th, 1967.

In light of the fact that the artist is preparing their report on this matter, to be included in the general report on the Sister Lucy Case, their name and professional resume will be kept confidential for now.





The “Official” Image: A Devious Gift That Keeps Giving
Sister Lucy Truth exclusively broke the reality that one of the most widely circulated, “officially” approved photographs of “Sister Lucy” and Paul VI in 1967 is, in fact, a fraud. This “Official” image is below:
INSERT: 1 - Official Image Lucia and Paul VI

We proved that this “Official” image could be traced all the way back to a June 13, 1967 publication of Voz De Fatima, the official mouthpiece of the Shrine of Fatima, thus refuting any argument that the image emanated from some “unofficial” source years later.
However, it is important to now focus in on precisely the level of deception at work with this Official image. Indeed, as we will prove below, this is not the case where a picture of “Lucia” was innocently cut out and placed next to Paul VI in collage fashion. No, it wasn’t that simple. The level of intent is far more calculating.
As conclusively demonstrated below, the source image of the “Lucia” depicted in the “Official” photo was itself manipulated. Specifically, the eyes and a portion of the face were altered to fit the narrative. We will explain. First, it is critical to realize that what we will call the “Source” image used for the “Lucia” portion of the “Official” photo is the image below:
INSERT: 2 - Source Image Lucia Young

The problem with this photograph, however, is that the woman’s body is facing the wrong direction relative to the position necessary to render a believable Official image. Indeed, her body is facing left even though her eyes are looking right. To be used in the Official image, the woman in this Source photo would need to appear as though both her eyes and body were pointed out toward the cheering crowds at Fatima next to Paul VI. Simple fix, just flip the image, right? Wrong.
INSERT: 3 - Source Image Lucia Young_Reversed

When the image is flipped (for a mirror image), the woman’s body now faces the “correct” direction—perfectly consistent with the “Official” image—but, problematically, the woman’s eyes now gaze the “wrong” way. How can this be corrected?
The only option is to manipulate the eyes so they too face the correct direction. Precisely how these eyes were manipulated—or even whose eye(s) were used—for the Official image is unknown. Could one of the eyes actually be from the real Lucia? What is known is that the position of the eyes on the Official image is impossible because they gaze in the same direction as the body faces when we know that in the Source image the body faces one direction and the eyes look in the opposite direction. In analyzing how the eyes were specifically manipulated, two interesting items have emerged.

FIRST ANOMALY: The “Miracle” of the Eyebrow
In the Official image, “Sister Lucia’s” left eyebrow is unnaturally floating off of her face. This physical “miracle” will undoubtedly be cited in her forthcoming canonization along with her amazing ability to bi-locate (tri-locate?) as documented elsewhere on this site. This anomaly is difficult to detect with the naked eye on the Official image but it is apparent upon close forensic image analysis. Below are several important images: (i) a close up of the Official image, (ii) a close up of the face with the colors inverted (ala a negative image), and (iii) a magnified view of the face using publicly available forensic photo software. Anyone reading this article can download the Official image and view these anomalies for themselves:
The floating eyebrow is apparent even to the naked eye upon close inspection.

INSERT: 4 - Close Up Official Lucia Eyebrow

If the Official image is posted into a free photo editing software such as and Control+Shift+I is pressed, the following image emerges.

INSERT: 5 - Official Image Lucia Young_Inverted Color

Below is the face of “Lucia” from the Official image magnified using free forensic software, Forensically.

INSERT: 6 - Official Image Lucia Magnified

SECOND ANOMALY: Deliberately Aged Face and Protruding Eyelid
It is evident the Source image was intentionally manipulated to make the individual appear older. This can be most clearly observed by comparing the right eye of the Source image with the right eye of the Lucia depicted on the cover of a book published in 1975, Lucie Raconte Fatima. A comparison reveals that the image was added to or otherwise altered below her right eye because (a) there is a clear, unmistakable, unnatural protrusion of the lower right eyelid up into the eye, and (b) the crease below the right eye in the Official image with Paul VI and the Lucie Raconte Fatima image is nonexistent in the Source photo. It is unclear whether the unnatural protrusion of the lower lid is evident in the “Official” image, but the eyes of that image had to undergo further manipulation to obtain the “correct” position as mentioned, above.
Lucie Raconte Fatima, 1975

INSERT: 7 - Lucie Raconte Fatima cover

Again, here is the Source image.
INSERT: 8 - Source Image Lucia close up

Close up of the Lucie Raconte Fatima cover photo
INSERT: 9 - Lucie Raconte Fatima close up_1

Below is another image of the Lucie Raconte Fatima book cover with a different resolution

INSERT: 10 - Lucie Raconte Fatima close up_2

Anomalies to the crease and lower eyelid clearly evident.

INSERT: 11 - Lucie Raconte Fatima close up_3

Conclusion. The Official image is more than a cut and paste job. It represents specific, intentional manipulation to present the perfect image to fit a convenient narrative. Indeed, one official publication with “Ecclesiastical Approval”— Documents on Fatima & the Memoirs of Sister Lucia, pg. 79—ironically captioned the Official image with a curious quote from Bishop John Venancio (pictured to Paul VI’s right on the Official image). Venancio commented on the meaning of the Official image as follows: “This gesture of the Pope indicated, ‘What Sister Lucia stands for, I stand behind.’”

Since we know with certainty that the “Lucia” in the Official image was a carefully manipulated fraud, it appears Bishop Venancio’s words were truer than anyone realized: what Paul VI actually stood behind was an intentional deception.





30th Nov 2018

The third part of the secret revealed at the Cova da Iria-Fatima, on 13 July 1917.
I write in obedience to you, my God, who command me to do so through his Excellency the Bishop of Leiria and through your Most Holy Mother and mine.
After the two parts which I have already explained, at the left of Our Lady and a little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his left hand; flashing, it gave out flames that looked as though they would set the world on fire; but they died out in contact with the splendour that Our Lady radiated towards him from her right hand: pointing to the earth with his right hand, the Angel cried out in a loud voice: ‘Penance, Penance, Penance!'. And we saw in an immense light that is God: ‘something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it' a Bishop dressed in White ‘we had the impression that it was the Holy Father'. Other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions. Beneath the two arms of the Cross there were two Angels each with a crystal aspersorium in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood of the Martyrs and with it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to God.

You can read above the text of the "Third Secret" released by the Vatican in 2000. This text has been endorsed by John Paul II and "Sister Lucy" as she appeared at Fatima in the Year 2000, supposedly at the age of 93. The woman who was put forward as "Sister Lucy of Fatima," from 1967 on until 2005, was most known for her adulation of John Paul II. This adulation was demonstrated in her happy, smiling, and enthusiastic meetings with John Paul II from 1982 to 2000, in her holding hands with John Paul II for some two hours ---- in full light of the cameras ---- in 2000, her awkward and borderline sacrilegious attempt to kiss John Paul II's hand right after he gave her the communion wafer at Fatima in 2000 --- someone that supposedly received holy communion from an angel and was told to prostrate herself before the Blessed Sacrament because of its overwhelming holiness --- her immediate embrace of the two envelopes in 2000, that were brought to her by Cardinal Bertone and supposedly "contained" the "Third Secret." This fawning adulation continued until her very death bed in which she embraced a letter sent to her by the equally dying John Paul II --- remember, he was the man who, probably the first cleric in the history of the Church, allowed the Buddhist to put an idol of Buddha upon the tabernacle, at St. Peter's church in Assisi in 1986, so that the Buddhists could worship it there. Her endorsement of the released "Third Secret,"which she had said must be released by 1960 "since it will be clearer then," was a further act of near-hyperdulia offered to John Paul II as the central figure of the Third Secret. It was all about him.

One thing that strikes me is that this "Sister Lucy" kept the world in suspense for some 55 year waiting for the message of the Third Secret. In light of the message above, this wait was a meaningless one since the message is convoluted and has absolutely no practical significance for the members of the Mystical Body of Christ.

In this regard, Sister Lucy Truth Update: Just last night the Investigator was attempting to schedule a date for the analysis of the writings of "Sister Lucy" and the text of the Third Secret.
I know, I know, "why is everything taking so long?" All I can say is, that it just is but I am trying to get all the materials analyzed by the experts and finished as soon as possible. Website is also being constructed.




Dr. Chojnowski's Commentary in Red.


At the end of the Mass presided over by the Holy Father at Fatima, Cardinal Angelo Sodano, the Secretary of State, made this announcement in Portuguese, which is given here in English translation:

Remember, this was all done in front an applauding and attentive "Sister Lucy" who was obviously made aware of what was going to be announced that day. She did not show the slightest objection to release or to the hinted at content of the message.

Brothers and Sisters in the Lord!
At the conclusion of this solemn celebration, I feel bound to offer our beloved Holy Father Pope John Paul II, on behalf of all present, heartfelt good wishes for his approaching 80th Birthday and to thank him for his vital pastoral ministry for the good of all God's Holy Church; we present the heartfelt wishes of the whole Church.

So at the beginning of the announcement, 40 years late in coming, that was supposed to reveal something so critical for the future of the human race that Our Lady insisted upon its being kept secret and held for the right time when it would clearly tell us about something of universal import that would have critical bearing on the souls of every human being, a "Happy Birthday" is offered to the Man of the Hour, Karol Wojtyla (JPII), whose "vital pastoral ministry" is also praised. Thank you for Assisi, and for altar girls, and for the doctrine of universal salvation!

On this solemn occasion of his visit to Fatima, His Holiness has directed me to make an announcement to you. As you know, the purpose of his visit to Fatima has been to beatify the two “little shepherds”. Nevertheless he also wishes his pilgrimage to be a renewed gesture of gratitude to Our Lady for her protection during these years of his papacy. This protection seems also to be linked to the so-called third part of the “secret” of Fatima.

Here is the first spinning of the Secret, before we are even given a text, we are immediately led to believe that it somehow part of Our Lady's "protection" of wonderful JPII's ministry. So if the Third Secret was about the assassination attempt of John Paul II, what good was the Third Secret. It would have allowed him to know that it was coming and that he would have to duck? Notice that one of the men that the Real Third Secret points to as being on the side of evil, is instead given the security blanket endorsement of the Mother of God. How diabolical.

That text contains a prophetic vision similar to those found in Sacred Scripture, which do not describe photographically the details of future events, but synthesize and compress against a single background facts which extend through time in an unspecified succession and duration. As a result, the text must be interpreted in a symbolic key. Whoa? So, in other words, we will not be able to understand the words of Our Lady, meant for the people, but rather must have it all interpreted for us by the hard-core Modernists in the Vatican.

The vision of Fatima concerns above all the war waged by atheistic systems against the Church and Christians (Liars!) This is part of the Second Secret. , and it describes the immense suffering endured by the witnesses of the faith in the last century of the second millennium. It is an interminable Way of the Cross led by the Popes of the twentieth century.

So we are, first of all, equating Popes Pius X, XI and XII with the destroyers of the Catholic World, pre-1965, John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, and John Paul II. And these latter four are NO DOUBT, the four who fall under the condemnation of the Third Secret of Fatima. The men listed above were those who tried to transform the Church into a Leftist Social and Charitable Club that Makes People Feel Nice.

According to the interpretation of the “little shepherds” Would Jacinta and Francisco, who just happened to have left this world by 1920, even know what "interpretation" means -- the only person we rely on for this supposed "interpretation" is Sister Lucy II (post-1957), which was also confirmed recently by Sister Lucia, “the Bishop clothed in white” who prays for all the faithful is the Pope. Why would she describe it first as a "bishop dressed in white" if she knew for certain that it was "the Pope"? So know we see we are being led by the Modernist Cardinals and "Sister Lucy" to think that the real focus of the entire Third Secret is not "the pope" as in all those in the 20th century, but rather, John Paul II in particular and alone. As he makes his way with great difficulty towards the Cross (Meaning? Since when did Karol Wojtyla -- ever in his life struggle against Leftism and Communism as such. His main intellectual work, The Acting Person, was an attempt to express a Leftist view of Man which was open to "moral values." Why was he allowed out of Poland, always capable fo traveling to Rome and Paris when Cardinal Wyszynski was either held in jail or not allowed to leave the country? Moreover, by teaching that Christ was united to ALL Men in His Incarnation and that that union could not be broken --- a teaching of universal salvation --- JPII completely negated the necessity of the Cross. ) amid the corpses of those who were martyred (Bishops, priests, men and women Religious and many lay people), he too falls to the ground, apparently dead (The text of the vision said that he fell down dead not "apparently" dead), under a hail of gunfire.

After the assassination attempt of 13 May 1981, it appeared evident that it was “a mother's hand that guided the bullet's path”, enabling “the Pope in his throes” to halt “at the threshold of death” A clever way of explaining why JPII did not ACTUALLY die. This also implies, that it was the Russians who inspired the Turkish assassin Ali Agka to attempt to kill JPII. There is no such evidence, in fact the evidence seems to point to Agca being a part of Operation Gladio, an operation financed and organized by the CIA (Pope John Paul II, Meditation from the Policlinico Gemelli to the Italian Bishops, Insegnamenti, XVII, 1 [1994], 1061). On the occasion of a visit to Rome by the then Bishop of Leiria-Fatima, the Pope decided to give him the bullet which had remained in the jeep after the assassination attempt, so that it might be kept in the shrine. By the Bishop's decision, the bullet was later set in the crown of the statue of Our Lady of Fatima. Thus completely settling and highjacking the question of the Third Secret.

The successive events of 1989 led, both in the Soviet Union and in a number of countries of Eastern Europe, to the fall of the Communist regimes which promoted atheism. For this too His Holiness offers heartfelt thanks to the Most Holy Virgin.

In other parts of the world, however, attacks against the Church and against Christians, with the burden of suffering they bring, tragically continue. Even if the events to which the third part of the “secret” of Fatima refers now seem part of the past, In other words, we have revealed it now when it is of nothing but historical importance. Sorry Catholic folks you have been waiting a long time for nothing! Nothing of all this relates to the Apostasy in the Church --- OR RATHER THE APOSTASY THAT TAKES PEOPLE OUT OF THE CHURCH.

Our Lady's call to conversion and penance, issued at the start of the twentieth century, remains timely and urgent today. “The Lady of the message seems to read the signs of the times—the signs of our time—with special insight... The insistent invitation of Mary Most Holy to penance is nothing but the manifestation of her maternal concern for the fate of the human family, in need of conversion and forgiveness” (Pope John Paul II, Message for the 1997 World Day of the Sick, No. 1, Insegnamenti, XIX, 2 [1996], 561).

In order that the faithful may better receive the message of Our Lady of Fatima, the Pope has charged the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith with making public the third part of the “secret”, after the preparation of an appropriate commentary.

Brothers and sisters, let us thank Our Lady of Fatima for her protection. To her maternal intercession let us entrust the Church of the Third Millennium. Will it be stranger than the Church of the second half of the Twentieth Century?
Sub tuum praesidium confugimus, Sancta Dei Genetrix! Intercede pro Ecclesia. Intercede pro Papa nostro Ioanne Paulo II. Amen. In other words, the whole thing is about John Paul II and his life in Poland and in Rome. End of Story.

Well, guess what, The Miracle of the Son (Such a miracle displayed so that all might except a message of spiritual milquetoast?), the Third Secret, and, yes, Sister Lucy herself were highjacked by a band that surely must be the most criminal in human history. Who would dare do such a thing to the clearly expressed will of Heaven?

Fatima, 13 May 2000

More to come.....




2019: The Year We Find Out Who this Woman Is. Perhaps by the end of 2018, We Will Definitively Know Who She is Not.

December 23, 2018

1967 Fatima. A Sister Lucy for A New Church and a New Age

Here is the list of all of the investigations currently on-going. Those in red are completed.

The Following Experts are Currently Involved with this Investigation:

1) Private Investigator's Preliminary Report

2) Plastic Surgeon

3) Ophthalmologist

4) Prosthodontist

5) Oral and Maxiliofacial Surgery

6) Oculoplastic Surgeon

7) Periodontist, Endodontist, and Orthodontist

8) Facial Recognition Technology Experts

9) Periodontologist

10) Facial Recognition Experts

11) Handwriting Expert

12) Forensic Artist/Dentist

13) Facial Recognition Lab




Announcement 2019: Sworn Declaration from Handwriting Analyst Demonstrates that Sister Lucy II was Imposter. Vatican-Released Third Secret text Proven to be Authentic and Consistent with Memoirs of Sister Lucy I.

January 01, 2019

True and False Sister Lucy.
Is there a "Fourth Secret"?

Dr. Chojnowski: As we try to figure out how best to post the Handwriting Experts Sworn Declaration which indicates that the handwriting of Sister Lucy post-1958 is NOT consistent with the handwriting of Sister Lucy pre-1958 --- hence indicating forgery and doing much to verify the judgment that the post-1958 Sister Lucy was an imposter --- I want to give my readers the heads up as to what was found in a very brief form. The entire 114 page declaration will be available as soon as we are able. The report indicates:

  1. The writing of "Sister Lucy" in 1969 was NOT consistent with the writings of Sister Lucy in her memoirs form the 20s, 30s, and 40s, indicating forgery and an imposter operating at the time.
  2. The Third Secret text dating from 1944, released by the Vatican in 2000, was AUTHENTIC AND CONSISTENT WITH THE 20s, 30s, and 40s, writings of Sister Lucy I. Although this is not stated in the declaration, it would seem to open up the possibility or even likelihood, as has been put forward by figures such as Antonio Socci, Fr. Nicholas Gruner, and Christopher Ferrara, that there is a "Fourth Secret," which has not been released yet by the Vatican, which would be Our Lady's words which explain and give the message that were meant to accompany the vision apparently given to the Children of Fatima on July 13, 1917. The first two Secrets have accompanying messages explaining the visions, why does the Third not?

The investigator has indicated that this declaration has done much to move forward the Sister Lucy Truth investigation. Keep checking back for the posted handwriting declaration, for the link to the new evidentiary website, and for the further scientific reports with will address the Sister Lucy I and II question from all different scientific perspectives.




Forged Letter from 1969 by Sister Lucy II demands Absolute Submission to Paul VI.
Glad it wasn't Written By Sister Lucy!

January 02, 2019

Fake Sister Lucy Tells All to Follow the Revolution of Paul VI

Here is the content of the falsified and forged letter attributed to "Sister Lucy" dated December 27, 1969. If you refuse to recognize the imposture, how do you get around acknowledging that Sister Lucy endorsed the Modernist Revolution.

English translation of the text:


Last edited: