Post-councillor Confusion

z131.jpg


"For, by his Incarnation, he, the son of God, in a certain way united himself with each man."(John Paul II, Redemptor Hominid) This quote from John Paul II is a definite sign of his humanistic and modernist views. He also said,"The sin of the killing of Christ on the cross has redeemed us." Or how about, "Christ is in every man." On January 11, 1989 he said,"...that the part of the creed talking about Christ descending into hell can be interpreted metaphorically."

"How does a Catholic sin against faith? A Catholic sins against the faith by apostasy, heresy, indifferentism, and by taking part in non-Catholic worship."(Catechism of Trent, Catechism of Pope St. Pius X, Baltimore Catechism) Canon Law states: It is not permitted at all for faithful to assist in any active manner or have any part in the worship of non-Catholics.( Canon 1258)

False Ecumenism

All of these ,so called, Popes expressed views that showed their religious indifference. As if all roads lead to heaven. This shows also the influence of Masonic false ecumenism. True Catholic dogma does not teach this.

"It firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the catholic church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the catholic church before the end of their lives;"{Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Cantate Domino, 1441, ex cathedra}

So why do these Popes continue to contradict this clear teaching of the extraordinary magisterium? Let's look at some examples:

The kissing of the Qur-an (the “holy” books of the false religion of Islam) by Pope John Paul the Second scandalised thousands in the Catholic Church.
Add the public dethroning of Christ: the Assisi blasphemy, where the devotees of every false god known to man were invited to stand alongside Peter. Surely we are witnessing the “Diabolical disorientation of the Church, starting at the top,” of which Our Lady forewarned us at Fatima?
[Essay by Don McGovern with acknowledgement to by the Remnant]

This is the contradiction I was talking about, Ecumenism and interfaith dialogue always implies or at least encourages the heresy of Indifferentism, according to which it does not matter what religion one professes, as long as one has good will or shares certain beliefs or “values” in common. Until the death of Pope Pius XII in 1958, the Catholic Church always opposed the ecumenical movement and offered as her own alternative the conversion of all non-Catholics to the only true Church, which has been instituted by God as the sole means of salvation.

images-4.jpeg


Sedevacantism

Sedevacantism is the merging of two Latin words meaning "the chair is vacant or empty." What chair? The chair of Peter of course! The only way Satan can prevail against the Church of Jesus Christ is by the "taking out of the way" of the Papacy. But if the "Popes" After Pius the XII ( ie. John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II, Benedict XVI, and Francis I ) are true Popes, then St. Peter and his successors have failed, and this we know is impossible. Eventhough, it is impossible for us to know the motives of these Popes, and wheather or not they were in mere material heresy, or actual obstinate formal heretics. Or is it?

"One must resist the Pope who openly destroys the Church."(St. Cajetan) These post-councillor Popes are all modernist who, by their own public material heresy, have put themselves outside the Catholic Church. Defection of the faith is accomplished by public heresy “Ipso facto” without any declaration. From any ecclesiastical office.(Council of Constance) So, even though Vatican I says,”a Pope cannot be judged by anyone.” The Pope is judged by his own actions. Once heresy is public, then that person ceases to be a member of the Church. [Pope Innocent III] Therefore he ceases to be Pope. This is a "de fide" Catholic teaching of the Church according to St. Robert Bellarmine, all the early Church Fathers taught this through the ordinary Magisterium.

St. Robert Bellarmine,( De Romano Pontifice, II, 30:) “For, in the first place, it is proven with arguments from authority and from reason that the manifest heretic is ‘ipso facto’ deposed. The argument from authority is based on St. Paul (Titus 3:10), who orders that the heretic be avoided after two warnings, that is, after showing himself to be manifestly obstinate – which means before any excommunication or judicial sentence. And this is what St. Jerome writes, adding that the other sinners are excluded from the Church by sentence of excommunication, but the heretics exile themselves and separate themselves by their own act from the body of Christ.”

St. Robert Bellarmine, (De Romano Pontifice, II, 30:) “This principle is most certain. The non-Christian cannot in any way be Pope, as Cajetan himself admits (ib. c. 26). The reason for this is that he cannot be head of what he is not a member; now he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian (lib. 4, epist. 2), St. Athanasius (Scr. 2 cont. Arian.), St. Augustine (lib. De great. Christ. Cap. 20), St. Jerome (contra Lucifer.) and others; therefore the manifest heretic cannot be Pope.

"When foulness invades the whole Church we must return to the Church of the past."(St. Vincent of Lerins) Pope St. Pius X also wrote the famed Oath Against Modernism which was required to be sworn to by clergy and others in the Church, and sought to warn the faithful before it was too late. Much work was done to extinguish modernist trends of thought within the Church thanks to this most venerable and saintly Pope, and to this day, he remains the most important saint to have ever fought against the poisonous infections of the movement.(https://www.catholicgentleman.net/2013/12/15-heresies-and-the-manly-saints-who-fought-them/)

SSPX

"Every single SSPX priest must make the Profession of Faith of 1998, sign a declaration of acceptance of all Vatican II doctrines, and declare his acceptance not only of the validity but also of the lawfulness of the Novus Ordo Missae of Paul VI."[Novus Ordo Watch]

"On June 29, Bishop Fellay made his first public comments in response to “Cardinal” Muller’s June 27 letter informing him of the new requirements. The following is an exclusive English translation of a post that appeared on the well-informed medias-catholique.info web site.

"It has now been two months since Bishop Bernard Fellay had to face the deans of the District of France, who publicly rejected the liberal arrangements envisaged by Menzingen and Rome for administering the sacrament of marriage within Tradition. A public letter opposing these arrangements garnered close to 700 signatures in a few weeks. The numerous comments revealed the faithful’s exasperation in the face of the present SSPX superior’s intrigues. To attempt to save his negotiations and his authority, Bishop Fellay struck the recalcitrant priests with very harsh penalties.

Despite multiple acts of allegiance from the Swiss bishop, there is the let-down. Cardinal Müller has put an end to the negotiations. No regularization without full and entire adherence to the Second Vatican Council: each member of the SSPX will first have to make the 1988 form of the profession of faith, then, secondly, accept explicitly the teachings of the Second Vatican Council and the post-conciliar period, and finally, thirdly, recognize not only the validity, but also the legitimacy of the new mass and sacraments of Vatican II.

This past June 29th, speaking after the ordination luncheon in Ecône, Bishop Fellay spoke of the “huge blow” and made known his disappointment: “It is like in the Game of the Goose. We were almost at the end and then we landed on the ‘go back to start’ square. Everything has fallen to the ground, it is necessary to begin again from square one.”

All of that fuss for what? The goose ought not to trust foxes. The backlash of Cardinal Müller, who intervenes after long years of more or less secret negotiations, speaks volumes about Bishop Fellay’s compromises during this goose game…

Bishop Fellay no longer has the trust of many of his priests or of many of the faithful. Henceforth he is snubbed by Rome. His term of office will expire next year…Michel Lefranc"

[Source: Michel Lefranc, “Les pourparlers entre Rome et la FSSPX, « c’est comme dans le jeu de l’oie » avoue Mgr Fellay”, medias-catholique.info, July 5, 2017; our translation; some formatting changed.]

Bishop Fellay does not represent my position, or some other SSPX persons. He is compromising us back into Rome, which is the true schism that broke from Catholicism after Vatican II. He wanted our priests to swear an oath accepting Vatican II, the schismatic Novus Ordo Misse; each member of the SSPX will first have to make the 1988 form of the profession of faith, then, secondly, accept explicitly the teachings of the Second Vatican Council and the post-conciliar period, and finally, thirdly, recognize not only the validity, but also the legitimacy of the new mass and sacraments of Vatican II. Thank God the deal fell through! The Novus Ordo rite is a new religion. Not Catholic! I am not relying on my own personal interpretation, but that of the Church. This does not include the blasphemous teachings of the post-councillor Popes. I apologize, but “to be silent before error is to be repulsive to God.”
 

Admin

Administrator
Sedevacantism

Sedevacantism is the merging of two Latin words meaning "the chair is vacant or empty." What chair? The chair of Peter of course! The only way Satan can prevail against the Church of Jesus Christ is by the "taking out of the way" of the Papacy. But if the "Popes" After Pius the XII ( ie. John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II, Benedict XVI, and Francis I ) are true Popes, then St. Peter and his successors have failed, and this we know is impossible. Eventhough, it is impossible for us to know the motives of these Popes, and wheather or not they were in mere material heresy, or actual obstinate formal heretics. Or is it?

"One must resist the Pope who openly destroys the Church."(St. Cajetan) These post-councillor Popes are all modernist who, by their own public material heresy, have put themselves outside the Catholic Church. Defection of the faith is accomplished by public heresy “Ipso facto” without any declaration. From any ecclesiastical office.(Council of Constance) So, even though Vatican I says,”a Pope cannot be judged by anyone.” The Pope is judged by his own actions. Once heresy is public, then that person ceases to be a member of the Church. [Pope Innocent III] Therefore he ceases to be Pope. This is a "de fide" Catholic teaching of the Church according to St. Robert Bellarmine, all the early Church Fathers taught this through the ordinary Magisterium.

St. Robert Bellarmine,( De Romano Pontifice, II, 30:) “For, in the first place, it is proven with arguments from authority and from reason that the manifest heretic is ‘ipso facto’ deposed. The argument from authority is based on St. Paul (Titus 3:10), who orders that the heretic be avoided after two warnings, that is, after showing himself to be manifestly obstinate – which means before any excommunication or judicial sentence. And this is what St. Jerome writes, adding that the other sinners are excluded from the Church by sentence of excommunication, but the heretics exile themselves and separate themselves by their own act from the body of Christ.”

St. Robert Bellarmine, (De Romano Pontifice, II, 30:) “This principle is most certain. The non-Christian cannot in any way be Pope, as Cajetan himself admits (ib. c. 26). The reason for this is that he cannot be head of what he is not a member; now he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian (lib. 4, epist. 2), St. Athanasius (Scr. 2 cont. Arian.), St. Augustine (lib. De great. Christ. Cap. 20), St. Jerome (contra Lucifer.) and others; therefore the manifest heretic cannot be Pope.

"When foulness invades the whole Church we must return to the Church of the past."(St. Vincent of Lerins) Pope St. Pius X also wrote the famed Oath Against Modernism which was required to be sworn to by clergy and others in the Church, and sought to warn the faithful before it was too late. Much work was done to extinguish modernist trends of thought within the Church thanks to this most venerable and saintly Pope, and to this day, he remains the most important saint to have ever fought against the poisonous infections of the movement.(https://www.catholicgentleman.net/2013/12/15-heresies-and-the-manly-saints-who-fought-them/)



You will see that Cor Mariae's position on sedevacantism is no longer debateable.

..
 
Top